Skip to main content

Table 8 Precision and recall rates from the machine learning approach and CRIS’ pattern matching approach

From: Development and evaluation of a de-identification procedure for a case register sourced from mental health electronic records

Types of PI

MIST performance

CRIS performance

Total Number of Notes scanned

20

20

Total number of PI instances

191

191

Number of PIs correctly identified and masked (True Positives)

154

169

Number of PIs that should have been masked (False Negatives)

43

22

Number of instances masked that should not have been masked (False Positives)

8

0

Precision

95.1%

100%

Recall

78.1%

88.5%