Table 2 Comparison of PCC and SDM between patient groups

Gender

- Man

2.1 (0.63)

2.4 (0.87)

- Women

2.1 (0.71)

2.3 (0.83)

(p > 0.60)

(p > 0.10)

t = 0.447; n = 574

t = 1.425; n = 573

Education

- Low

2.2 (0.65)

2.3 (0.78)

- Medium

2.1 (0.66)

2.4 (0.77)

- High

2.0 (0.56)

2.5(0.81)

(p > 0.40)

(p > 0.20)

t = 0.741; n = 366

t = 1.250; n = 366

Age

- 18–65 years

2.1 (0.69)

2.3 (0.83)

- 65+70 years

2.0 (0.65)

2.2 (0.93)

(p > 0.70)

(p > 0.40)

t = 0.243; n = 516

t = 0.706; n = 516

Functional health status

- Poor/average

2.2 (0.62)

2.3 (0.75)

- Good/very good/excellent

2.2 (0.65)

2.4 (0.84)

(p > 0.60)

(p > 0.30)

t = 0.443; n = 412

t = 0.889; n = 411

Chronic conditions

- No

2.1 (0.65)

2.3 (0.83)

- Yes

2.1 (0.64)

2.4 (0.80)

(p > 0.60)

(p > 0.05)

F = 0.397; n = 426

t = 1.653; n = 427