Skip to main content

Table 4 Investigation of the heterogeneity of the HRs according to CAPRA-based strata

From: Meta-analysis of predictive models to assess the clinical validity and utility for patient-centered medical decision making: application to the CAncer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA)

 

Number of studies per subgroup

Pooled HR (High versus Low) per subgroup

p-value

Pooled HR (Intermediate versus Low) per subgroup

p-value

Effective size

>  1000: 5

≤ 1000: 4

14.60 [7.24–29.43]

8.13 [4.13–16.01]

0.240

4.45 [2.32–8.54]

2.35 [1.59–3.47]

0.098

Inclusion period

Inclusion start ≥1999: 3

Inclusion start < 1999: 6

10.37 [5.00–21.49]

11.78 [5.83–23.80]

0.804

2.78 [1.83–4.24]

3.78 [2.04–7.00]

0.419

Geographic origin

American: 4

Other: 5

13.37 [9.25–19.32]

9.75 [4.02–23.60]

0.518

3.34 [2.41–4.61]

3.39 [1.48–7.77]

0.971