 Research article
 Open Access
 Published:
EDDAMAP: efficient datadependent approach for monitoring asymptomatic patient
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making volume 20, Article number: 245 (2020)
Abstract
Background
A pandemic affects healthcare delivery and consequently leads to socioeconomic complications. During a pandemic, a community where there lives an asymptomatic patient (AP) becomes a potential endemic zone. Assuming we want to monitor the travel and/or activity of an AP in a community where there is a pandemic. Presently, most monitoring algorithms are relatively less efficient to find a suitable solution as they overlook the continuous mobility instances and activities of the AP over time. Conversely, this paper proposes an EDDAMAP as a compelling datadependent technique and/or algorithm towards efficient continuous monitoring of the travel and/or activity of an AP.
Methods
In this paper, it is assumed that an AP is infected with a contagious disease in which the EDDAMAP technique exploits a GPSenabled mobile device by tagging it to the AP along with its travel within a community. The technique further examines the Spatiotemporal trajectory of the AP to infer its spatial timebounded activity. The technique aims to learn the travels of the AP and correlates them to its activities to derive some classes of point of interests (POIs) in a location. Further, the technique explores the natural occurring POIs via modelling to identify some regular stay places (SP) and present them as endemic zones. The technique adopts concurrent object feature localization and recognition, branch and bound formalism and graph theory to cater for the worst errorguaranteed approximation to obtain a valid and efficient query solution and also experiments with a realworld GeoLife dataset to confirm its performance.
Results
The EDDAMAP technique proofs a compelling technique towards efficient monitoring of an AP in case of a pandemic.
Conclusions
The EDDAMAP technique will promote the discovery of endemic zones and hence some public healthcare facilities can rely on it to facilitate the design of patient monitoring system applications to curtail a global pandemic.
Background
In recent decades, the attention of the public healthcare setting is drawn to the eradication of a global pandemic. During a pandemic, health officials develop an interest in knowing the health status of patients. By so doing, the patients are made to undergo health monitoring [1] by either visiting a health facility or using a GPSenabled mobile health information system, etc. Usually, the monitoring is done by recording the whereabouts of the patients as well as their routine activities [2, 3], such as a visit to health centre, theatre, tourist attraction, market, shopping mall, restaurants, and other public facilities and functions. Moreover, nowadays, the activity records [4, 5] of patients have become very useful in public healthcare settings for management purposes. This is because the activity records can be used for planning and decision making. For instance, inferencing the whereabouts of patients [6] by considering their activity records in realtime will considerably contribute to an informed decision. And thus the public healthcare facilities can derive some key information from the activity records to support management decisions on the derail of the spread of chronic diseases that can cause a pandemic. Researches show that there is an increasing number of patients with chronic health conditions over the years [7]. Therefore, managing chronic diseases has considerably become a global issue and continues to place pressure on patients in particular and the healthcare setting as well as the society in general [8]. Let’s take a look at an asymptomatic patient (AP) as an example. The AP is usually diagnosed with a chronic disease but has no noticeable symptoms and for that matter, it appears equally as active as any healthy individual. Therefore, it becomes quite a challenge and/or not ordinary to recognise the AP (i.e. without adequate health or laboratory test and/or a medical examination) so that ordinary people can isolate themselves to avoid close contact (i.e. a mechanism to prevent infestation). Despite the health education that is provided to the AP, it continues as a threat of the spread of contagious diseases. In this paper, our research motivation is based on the advances in patients health monitoring strategies [4] which make it common for some individuals to wear clothes that are equipped with sensors and/or global position system devices to check their health status [8] on the run (i.e. relatively at any place and everywhere when travelling and/or moving from one place to another). Nonetheless, researches show that the performance of existing monitoring systems continues to deteriorate over time, and this is due to some extent the use of inappropriate and/or underexplored design techniques [4] and the challenges with the tracking of continuous mobility instances and activities of outdoor mobile objects. As a result, it is prudent for researchers to develop some compelling techniques and/or algorithms to support the design, development and management of health information systems that will generally focus on monitoring outdoor mobile patients to curtail a global pandemic. This paper regards the foregoing problem as a maximise rangesum problem [9]. This is because, in spatial databases, the concept of finding the spatial position of objects concerning their location and time (e.g. spatial data stream) involves the fact that the positions of mobile objects need to be recorded over a range in a time frame. For example, Amagata and Hara [9] proposed the G2 algorithm as a maximised rangesum technique for monitoring spatial data streams. The G2 algorithm refers to a Graph in Grid index and consequently addresses the Maximizing Range Sum (MaxRS) monitoring problem [9]. The G2 algorithm is used to update the spatial dynamics of moving objects database incrementally, and thus with respect to time. In this paper, we seek to propose an algorithm and try to compare it with the existing G2 algorithm, to particularly enable us to attest to the validity and performance of our algorithm which is intended for monitoring the continuous mobility instances and the activities of an AP in case of a pandemic. Comparatively, the contribution of our proposed technique and/or algorithm to that of the G2 algorithm includes the continuous monitoring instances incorporated into the traditional moving object database. There seems to be a pressing issue when dealing with realtime monitoring of continuous moving objects, with which the existing spatial query methods and/or algorithms can only cater for static objects and/or instantaneous monitoring of moving objects. For that matter, they are not scalable to continuous streaming environments and hence cannot relatively offer a suitable solution. As a way forward, this paper exploits a compelling technique and/or algorithm that is purposely used for the efficient monitoring of continuous MaxRS. Moreover, our future work will consider much more existing related algorithms that are key on temporal attributes, and not only instantaneous but continuous moving object database scenarios and make some comparisons to improve on the performance validation of our proposed algorithm. Even though, when you compare our technique to other existing ones, there is much more resemblance in terms of the methodology. For instance, aside from the G2 algorithm, there are some other proposed algorithms in references [10] and [11] which are not compared due to the resource constraint of the present study. In this paper, however, our focus is to evaluate the validity of the proposed technique and/or algorithm and reserve a deeper comparison of it with the other existing algorithms as future work. Moreover, our proposed technique relies on the analysis of Spatiotemporal trajectory pattern where the core mandate is to detect the point of interest (i.e. not necessarily the point being a hotspot).
On the other hand, Zhang et al [10] proposed an algorithm which depends on Spatiotemporal clustering analysis and that is based on analysis of hotspot (i.e. point not necessarily a regular interest of the objects). And thus where the objects are always clustered in a region in a time frame. This kind of approach is a better fit for text classification and analysis and thus based on the traditional range queries, and other queries that use similar methodology such as the range query, skyline, knearest neighbour, reverse nearestneighbour and so forth. It is worth noting that, these aforementioned approaches consider the number of object points and/or higher dimensionality objects related to a specified region (i.e. hotspot) [12]. Moreover, pattern and clustering analyses are considered important theories and/or techniques in trajectory data mining and they can apply to construct the behaviour dynamics of moving objects. Furthermore, aside from finding the semantic context and association rules that exist in trajectory data, Qiu et al [11] developed a generalized framework to identify the various activities of users about their trajectory records. The approach applies to analyse the everyday lifestyle of mobile users which is farreaching to determining instantaneous mobility conditions of outdoor mobile users. The foregoing approach is very similar to our work, but the difference may lie on where our approach is centred on the continuous mobility instances of outdoor mobile users and their activities along with their travel. Furthermore, the approaches utilise a sample of a realworld GeoLife dataset produced by the Microsoft Asia Beijing for the validation of the techniques and/or algorithms. Moreover, the Zheng et al [13] technique considers a user behaviour prediction via collaborative filtering strategy and that is based on ranking the user’s preference. Also, it does not try to find the accurate prediction value for the user’s activities in a location, but it rather approximates the prediction value based on user preferences, and thus by making it relevant in practice. Furthermore, their study obtains user preferences based on the locations and activities history by ranking the locations and activities of the user for service recommendation purposes. However, using human labellers (i.e. labelling is done by a human being) to parse the usergenerated comments whenever a user is found in a certain location to get the activity labels seems not an ideal concept to explore. Moreover, the user comments are in text format and automatically the activities of the user can be detected based on text classification and analysis. Comparatively, rather than relying on the activity history in a specific location, our proposed technique is making use of the specific time and the duration or time frame that a user spends in a location to continuously determine the possible activity and/or behaviour of the outdoor mobile asymptomatic patient (i.e. emulated as an ordinary mobile user). Thus knowing the location of the asymptomatic patient (i.e. a user) through the location coordinates in realtime and that of the specific time and duration used on travelling and/or visiting the location can provide relevant knowledge to predict its behaviour, rather than depending solely on the posted text comments [13] which may potentially be misleading due to issues with privacy, etc. Similarly, finding and/or predicting the exact location of the outdoor mobile user and/or asymptomatic patient will practically not be very necessary and hence the location estimation is usually approximated based on user preferential value which is considered as a user tolerance. Our proposed technique considers a correlation analysis of the location and activity of the user. This approach can reveal some relevant knowledge on the behaviour of the user and thus making it useful in the design of stateoftheart outdoor mobile recommendation systems. Besides, Smyth [4] conducts a comparative study on sensors and real laboratory data and consequentially reveal that it is much easier to predict the health status of patients via sensor data. Also, ElSappagh el al [7] prove how easier it is to track the fitness of patients using sensor data. Notwithstanding, Or et al [14] propose that most of the modern health information systems have underexplored design technique challenges [5]. Moreover, Rajkumar et al [15] propose an improved software intelligent system towards enhancing the performance of a hearing impairment system to provide a solution to audiological problems. Whereas, Singh et al [16] introduce a deep learning model towards human activity recognition such that without prior knowledge the model can be used to classify human activities. However, Singh et al model [16] will heuristically not be suitable to deploy practically to investigate a continuous moving outdoor user such as an AP. For instance, it is important to obtain a prior knowledge on the initial health status of the AP follow by monitoring the activities of the AP as the stance of the present paper. Furthermore, Nogueira et al [5] propose a biofeedback system technology that can be used to evaluate the quality of life of patients. Whereas Crepaldi et al [1] evaluate health information systems based on software engineering metrics by emphasising on the system methods and designs and further propose that a lot of the existing approaches for managing the health records of patients are not efficient as a result of overuse of resources. Wu et al [17] identify two peculiar issues when dealing with monitoring the mobility of objects. The first issue considers how to correlate the spatial and temporal information about the location of the objects to enhance predictions. The second issue considers how to develop effective and efficient large scale practicaloriented predictive systems e.g. health information decision support systems. Considering these two aforementioned issues, it is quite harder to find a readily available solution. However, once again this paper strongly derives motivation from the ubiquitous builtin Global Positioning System (GPS) mobile devices and/or applications [18]. Using GPSenabled mobile devices and/or applications coupled with other wireless technologies can improve the solution to monitoring problems. This is because the GPSbased devices can acquire the position and/or location data of an outdoor mobile user on the run [19]. Similarly, it is relatively inexpensive to find the geographical location, the spatial position, the time stamp and the place of interests (POIs) of patients (or outdoor mobile users) by exploiting a GPSenabled mobile application. Furthermore, monitoring an outdoor mobile patient can be defined as the continuous (or periodic) measurement and analysis of an outdoor mobile patient biosignals from a distance by employing mobile computing, wireless communications, and networking technologies [20]. Suppose that we want to monitor the various places in a specific community where the AP will visit in future. Particularly, let’s try to reveal those places where the AP will mostly stay. It is not trivial to achieve a solution to this problem. For instance, a continuous moving AP can exhibit some dynamics and/or varying degree of interests with regards to its behaviour. This property contributes to the basic functional attributes of almost every continuous moving object database. Therefore, it can be emphasised that the behaviour of the AP is subjected to location influences by either inherent or acquire properties of the location. Therefore, tagging the AP with a particular interest and doing so in an incremental fashion and continuoustime intervals (i.e. streaming data instances) becomes a challenging task. This is because the process will require excessive computation [19] and a lot of software and hardware resources. Nonetheless, with the aid of ubiquitous GPSenabled mobile devices and available methods of computing the position and location of objects, the task can relatively be executed efficiently with less troubles. Therefore, among the benefits of carrying out this relevant task is to reveal the whereabouts of AP in realtime to facilitate the derail of a global pandemic. To reiterate, the focus of this paper is mainly to propose EDDAMAP which is referred to as an Efficient DataDependent Approach for Monitoring Asymptomatic Patient. The objective of EDDAMAP is to facilitate to detect the stay place (SP) of AP to ensure proper and efficient monitoring of AP within a community. We consider the POIs based on the Spatiotemporal trajectories [21] of the AP. Thus when an AP is visiting some interesting places and engaging in certain activities in a community within some time intervals. It is worth noting that there exist two categories of SP [21] when dealing with object monitoring. These are singlepoint location (SPL) and multipoint location (MPL). The SPL refers to a location where AP has visited and spent an inordinate amount of time, and this is illustrated in Fig. 1. Whereas MPL refers to a location where AP has visited and spent relatively a short time and this is also illustrated in Fig. 1. These two categories of SP significantly contribute to trajectory analyses towards objects location monitoring and prediction problems [21]. Given a set of POIs, unit weight and user specifiedsized rectangle r, we aim to find an enclosing r with maximised weightedsum of POIs and locate a centroid as SP. Assuming a prior knowledge of AP, we employ similar algorithmic design from work [9] and concurrent localisation and recognition, branch and bound formalism and multiobject instance methods from work [22] by considering the AP and its current timestamp position in a location under general monitoring. The Spatiotemporal trajectories of the AP that consist of POIs are generated in a continuoustime interval to support the design of gridbased index data structure and algorithm towards achieving a valid and efficient solution for detecting an SP. The SP information can serve as relevant knowledge to the public healthcare facilities to inform the potentials of an AP on spreading contagious diseases. This paper is particularly relevant to the public healthcare settings and computing communities as it provides an overview of the technicalities involved in monitoring a mobile patient and also highlights issues related to the design of monitoring systems. The propose EDDAMAP technique and/or algorithm can be utilised by the healthcare settings to improve the features, design and development of prospective health information system applications for monitoring an outdoor mobile patient in case of a pandemic. On the other hand, the computing community and the related fields of study will gain a broader view of the novel techniques for the design and development of large scale health information system applications on outdoor mobile patients monitoring.
In summary, this paper seeks to derive a compelling monitoring technique towards advancing the health information technology industry by proposing a trajectory data mining oriented design technique and/or algorithm for the continuous monitoring of the travel, activities and health of an outdoor mobile asymptomatic patient in case of a pandemic. Trajectory data mining and/or Spatiotemporal trajectory mining is not entirely a new research area in computing. The domain has been explored in the recent past to find a solution to several realworld and multifacet problems [23–27]. Thus, the proposed technique and/or algorithm will improve the design and management of stateoftheart outdoor mobile patient monitoring system applications. The experiment result evaluation validates the proposed EDDAMAP technique as robust and easy to implement and can also support the design of existing patient health monitoring systems. Further, the public healthcare settings can rely on the technique to improve patient monitoring system applications as well as to make an informed decision on a global pandemic.
The remainder of the paper is as follows. The method underlying the propose EDDAMAP technique is detailed in “Developing the algorithm” section. In the “Evaluating the algorithm” section, we present a graph of the simulation results of the propose EDDAMAP algorithm and the result discussions with possible improvement. Finally, in the “Conclusions” section, we present the conclusions of the paper with some future work.
Method
Developing the algorithm
Trajectory
First of all, we define trajectory as a sequence of tuple given by P = {(x_{1},y_{1},ta_{1},ts_{1}),...,(x_{k},y_{k},ta_{k},ts_{k})}. Such that ta_{1}<ta_{2}<,..., <ta_{k} and ts_{1}<ts_{2}<,..., <ts_{k}. Where P is referred to as any spatial position of outdoor mobile user or object, x and y represent the location coordinates, ta and ts denote the respective arrival time and stay time of a user who is in a specified location. It is essential to also note that P is subjected to a unit positive weight including other location features such as altitude. However, the altitude is insignificant so far as trajectory analysis is concerned [21].In this paper, we refer to the Spatiotemporal trajectory as the timebounded spatial activity of continuous moving outdoor mobile user such as AP.
Trajectory monitoring instances
Assume that P(n) has countablyinfinite POIs. If p(i) is any identified POIs then it follows that p(i)={x,y,w}. Such that p(i)∗w∈R^{+} and p(i)∈P(n). Where x and y are spatial position coordinates and w is a positive weight which is defined by features of the monitored location where the outdoor mobile user (e.g. AP) is positioned. Our question is how to find stay place SP of an AP who is loitering around any outdoor location. Motivation is being derived by computing for the most visited and stay place of the AP within the monitored location with the aid of GPS data on the AP. Hence we regard the monitored location as a community where the AP will live, stay and/or travel and at the same time engaging in various routine activities such as dining, shopping. spotting, visiting, adventuring, and a lot more. Suppose that m represents a search space and n represents an entire monitored location. Using the Eq. 1 we can obtain p(i) such that i = 1,...,m and m <n. This will imply that if m = n then no relevant task to execute due to the search space being equal to the entire monitoring location. Moreover, if m >n then the task is not practical to merit execution.
Suppose that R is a community and r is a specific location (e.g. neighbourhood) in R such that r∈R. Heuristically, we can monitor r continuously to obtain any POIs which will represent the point of interest of the AP. Let p(i)∈p(n) denote weightedsum of the POIs. To ensure that any p(i)^{′}s are maximised in r we heuristically establish the objective function in Eq. 2 to handle such query. Where p(i)(w) denotes any identified weighted POIs. As a result, monitoring the r(w) will be the same as the SP. The process is simplified as shown in Fig. 2.
Concurrent localisation and recognition of POIs
This section presents how to locate, recognise and instantaneously monitor an AP when it is travelling and/or visiting interesting places in a given community such that we can explore the POIs to discover an SP. Of course, the SP is going to serve as a source of relevant information for the health setting to support decision making, because the AP can be a potential spreader of contagious disease and for that matter can cause a pandemic. Assuming there are n location features and p_{(n)} models which define the labels of the location. We adopt concurrent localization and recognition technique [22] to find a bounding rectangle r (i.e. achieving localization of the AP) that will enclose the various POIs. Also, we try to identify a model p_{(i)} that will maximise a prediction score L for the POIs (i.e. achieving recognition of the AP). When predicting the POIs, there will be L_{(i)} score (i.e. obtaining any partial score) which can either be an output of supportvector machine (SVM) classifier (i.e. achieving identification of the POIs) or treebased index (i.e. achieving categorisation of the POIs). Alternatively, the prediction score which is denoted as L can be obtained by accumulating the partial scores denoted as L_{(i)} which are obtained from the various POIs. For that matter, we proceed by computing the prediction score L in an incremental fashion, and thus whenever a new POIs is discovered and/or a POIs is obsoleted and/or discarded. Assume that an anticipate prediction score is p_{(k)} when searching for a subsequent POIs (i.e. achieving evolution). We compute a p_{(k)} by creating an upper bound of the monitored location. Therefore, we employ that of the branch and bound formalism and/or technique [22,28] which can handle worst errorguaranteed approximation to obtain an arg maxkp_{(k)} by considering all the POIs data. Furthermore, the planesweep mechanism [22,28] is adopted as a suitable strategy to create an interval that will capture all the POIs data. Thereafter, we iterate the POIs within the location to split the location interval into two disjoints sets. Using the two disjoint intervals, we apply bounding strategy to decide on the next location for the POIs. As a result, the iteration is terminated where k becomes a singleton. We then consider that stage or state of the iteration as the point of optimal location for the POIs.
Expressing n location features given by the triplets, F=: {(ax_{k},by_{k},cL_{k})k:1,...,n} as any input, where x and y are the location coordinates and L is the location feature which is an Mdimensional vector. Whereas a, b, and c are constant coefficients and L_{(i)} denotes i−th element of L_{(k)} where i<k. We can find the partial scores L_{(i)} with which the various POIs will contribute to the total prediction score L and establish the optimization objective in Eq. 3. It follows from Eq. 2 that F_{(r)} will represent the POIs that are spatially bounded by the r. Therefore, computing for the \(\overrightarrow {L_{(k)}}\), it implies that the POIs can equally be obtained. This will imply that we can have more than one neighbourhoods within one community such that the AP can be continuously monitored whenever it is travelling or moving from one neighbourhood to another in the community and by so doing visiting places of interests in the community.
Suppose that we want to train SVM classifier for any POIs. The POIs can be taken as input to evaluate the SVM classifier margin by comparing any testing sample to each of any training sample. We can compare the weighted POIs that have support vector with any other aggregated partial scores to obtain a set of similarity scores. We can sum up the similarity scores by considering a chosen SVM offset values δ_{i} and then express the margin as the weightedsum of the POIs (i.e. considering all the partial similarity scores). This approach is not far from the one that is used in existing work [22] and thus if not the same. Denoting the \(\overrightarrow {\mu _{p}}\) as any vector with support vector weights for the pth training set of the POIs data, such that w ∈w_{(k)}. Assume that the ith element of pth training POIs denotes the weight of the ith SVM. If p is denoted as any identified POIs, then l_{p} and c_{p} will be the model label and feature score respectively. Therefore, the anticipated partial score can be computed via Eq. 4. It can be noted that h(·) will evaluate to 1 whenever the function is true (i.e. representing a true solution) and then it evaluates to 0 for false (i.e. representing no solution).
Branch and bound formalism
Drawing on the concept of the branch and bound formalism [22], we ensure that search space is disintegrated into disjoint subspaces. Through that, we discover the optimal value to represent the POIs. Heuristically, we assume w_{0} and w_{1} as maximum weightedsum POIs and weight of monitored location respectively. Let tol denotes the user errortolerance, we conjecture that w_{0}≥w_{1}(1−tol). Therefore, there will be a tradeoff between query efficiency and tol. However, the tol can always be finetuned such that it will be slightly higher than an actual (or a realistic) errorrate.
Branch technique
In this section, we discuss how our algorithm applies the branching operation as given in algorithm 1 to find the optimal location as the POIs. Let d be a subspace, and d_{1} and d_{2} be any two smaller subspaces. Base on upper bound estimation, and thus by considering the x and y coordinates of the general monitoring location (i.e. R) and m object models, we obtain Z_{1} and Z_{2} as two subsets of equalsize (i.e. as candidates). We transform the subspace d as given by d_{(i)} =: {(−x_{(i)},+x_{(i)}),(−x_{(i)},+x_{(i)}),m_{(i)}}, such that i = 1, 2 (i.e. binary) and y is split as d_{1} (i.e. points in Z_{1} are removed from −y as well as all x_{1}).
Bound technique
In this section we discuss how our algorithm applies the bounding operation to determine the largest and smallest bounding locations. This can be done by considering a given subspace d using the −x, +x, −y, +y and m parameters. Considering the x and y extremities, we obtain +b (i.e. + L_{i,j}) and −b (i.e.  L_{i,j}) as the largest and smallest rectangle (i.e. location) sizes respectively. Let a represent label for object model m, such that a ∈m. Using the dimension of a, we consider −b and +b intervals, and locate a space which includes as many positive weighted POIs (i.e. \(\overrightarrow {Z_{k}}\)(a) >0), and thus excluding as many negative weighted POIs (i.e. \(\overrightarrow {Z_{k}}\)(a) <0). At this stage, the Eq. 2 can heuristically apply. Considering the POIs, if there are more positive values than +b, and few negative values than −b in the rectangle (i.e. location), then it is assumed that an optimal solution is found. Otherwise, it is irrelevant to compute or search for a new rectangle (i.e. as an optimal or best location for the POIs). We can heuristically compute the upperbound say +J via Eq. 5. Similarly, lowerbound say −J can be computed via Eq. 6, and thus by adding many negative values, and subtracting many positive values. Both of the +J and −J are assumed to have object model a as a function of subspace d.
Where +h(x) and −h(x) are functions. If x is positive then +h(x) is evaluated. On the other hand, if x is negative then −h(x) is evaluated. Otherwise, the function will evaluate to 0 when x is neither positive nor negative. Finally, we compute the overall upper bound +J and lower bound −J for the subspace, d as given in Eqs. 7 and 8. Therefore, any SVM classification problems can be trained by adjusting the bounding estimates using offset values, say δ_{a} of the respective SVM classifier via Eq. 7.
Algorithmic pseudocode for POIs execution
We construct the algorithmic pseudocode for the POIs execution as provided in Algorithm 1.
Graph analysis and index data structure
Graph theory and network topology [19] are used in various domain of researches to find a solution to complex and dynamic networkrelated problems. Thus, graph base and topological data mining provide knowledge representation base on graph analysis to construct novel queries for the analysis of complex and dynamic networkrelated problems. Such as analyses of network connectivity behaviour [29], patterns and impacts of network systems, continuous Spatiotemporal trajectory joins [30], etc. Here we discuss the construction of a generalised index data structure for processing the trajectory of AP based on graph analysis.
Let’s consider Fig. 3 which is an illustration of tracking instances of POIs. Assuming there are ten positions instances of the AP representing POIs enclosed within rectangles A,..., H (i.e. representing individual places of visit or neighbourhood). As shown in 3, it can be seen that the red brokenline rectangle provides the optimal solution for having three of the total POIs as the maximised weightedsum.
Let G = (V, E) denotes a dynamic graph. Vertices V represent the position data leading to the discovery of POIs. As shown in Fig. 3, vertices are further transcribed as rectangles. An overlap of two vertices generate edges E. Therefore, onetoone mapping of vertices corresponds to edges. As shown in Fig. 3, we transform the POIs into vertices. As a result, we can now construct the dynamics of monitoring POIs in continuous time intervals via graph analysis. Following the dynamic process, we can derive the trajectory instances of AP based on Fig. 4. Therefore, we construct a tree graph to represent the dynamics of trajectory instances of AP [31] based on POIs as shown in Fig. 5. Further, we construct a tree data structure by concentrating on the core or usual trajectory of AP as shown in Fig. 6. It should be noted that graph G = (V, E) is dynamic, hence it can be reconstructed to reflect the dynamics of mobility. Therefore, if r_{i}, r_{j}∈V is generated then by conversion r_{i} is older than r_{j}. We present the relationship between graph G = (V, E) in Table 1. We then apply the concept of OriginDestination (OD) matrix to construct a list adjacency matrix. By so doing, it is now possible to design a generalised gridbased index data structure to cater for the continuous evolution of POIs leading to the discovery of SP. Thereby, we construct a gridbased index data structure as shown in Fig. 7.
Drawing on the study of graph theory, three properties can be defined based on Fig. 6 [9]. Firstly, if r_{i}, r_{j}∈V, then p_{i}≠p_{j}. Thus, if and only if there exists an overlap between V(r_{i}) and V(r_{j}). For instance, where V(r_{i}) is older than V(r_{j}), then (V(r_{i}),V(r_{j})) = r_{ij} = e_{i}∈E. Also, if e_{i}≠e_{j}, then NV(r_{i})≠NV(r_{j}), making p_{i} a subspace of V(r_{i}). Secondary, if P grid cells or spaces contain a set of p_{i} enclosed in r_{i}, then Eq. (2) is verifiable. It means those obsolete vertices are no longer needed to undergo maintenance as a result of the corresponding edges being held by the existing vertices. Thirdly, if r_{i}∈V then vertex r_{i} is considered as obsolete in circumstances where there are older vertices, and hence any p_{i} becomes the current position of AP. When AP moves from one place to another, the position data need to be updated, say R^{u}. Therefore, we R^{u} compare with all the existing POIs to update the gride cell or data structure accordingly. If m represents newly generated POIs and n represents the rate, then the time complexity for the process becomes O(mn), which is quite high. Therefore, we need to find a more suitable solution to improve on the complexity. Consequently, we modify G = (V,E) as illustrated in Fig. 5 to obtain G_{(i,j)} = (V_{(i,j)},E_{(i,j)}) as illustrated in Fig. 6. Thereby, cell g_{i} or g_{j} can be maintained in the graph G_{(i,j)}. As a result, if m new vertices are generated and added to G_{(i,j)}, then overlaps need to be checked with the corresponding g_{i} and g_{j} to update the grid cell data structure by a factor of G^{u}(i). Hence, at this stage, the time complexity will improve from O(mn) to O(m) for the total overlap. Therefore, the overall time complexity of the EDDAMAP algorithm becomes O (G^{u}(i)m^{u},n^{u}), which is very reasonable and a farreaching efficient solution. Where m is the average number of vertices undergoing overlap, and n is the average number of overlap. It should be noted that m^{u}<<m and n^{u}<<n. Hence, the cost of storage becomes O(V+E) for all G_{(i,j)} = (V_{(i,j)},E_{(i,j)}), and for every r_{i} to maintain p_{i}. Also, the worst space complexity becomes O(V^{2}) for n rounds of overlap, and that is almost equal to O(O^{2}) which is quite impractical to evaluate as worst space [9].
Continuous monitoring of POIs
Making use of Fig. 7, we can perform realtime monitoring of POIs towards achieving an SP. This is done by following the trajectory of the AP [32,33]. We deduce the maximised weightedsum of POIs and obtain a centroid as SP. Knowing the SP at some instance, we can compute newer SP by understanding the mobility pattern of the AP [3,34]. Let l(w) and \(\bar {p}(i)\) represent new SP and new POIs respectively. Supposing we have an existing cell g_{i,j}∈G. If \(g_{i,j} \dot w \textgreater l(w)\), then all the vertices in V_{(i,j)} (i.e. R) do not contain l(w). Therefore, it is not sufficient to compute the exact solution for p_{(i)}, where r_{i}∈V_{(i,j)}. Moreover, supposing cell g_{i,j}∈G, and assuming \(g_{i,j}\dot w \geq l(w)\), where vertices (or rectangle) \(r_{i'} \in V_{(i,j)}\phantom {\dot {i}\!}\). If \(l(\hat {w}) \textless p(i)w\) then \(\phantom {\dot {i}\!}r_{i'}\) does not contain p(i)w. Hence, we do not compute the exact solution for p(i)w. Consequently, Eq. 11 can be used to evaluate the evolving SP. Intuitively, we set kth largest weight as threshold upon continuously monitoring the topk of the POIs. Also, it is important to bound any errorrate based on a defined usertolerance (tol). Heuristically, we establish the optimization function as follows. Furthermore, we construct the algorithmic pseudocode for monitoring the POIs as given in Algorithm 2 and Algorithm 3.
Results
Evaluating the algorithm
In this section, our focus is to produce and evaluate the results of the algorithm based on experimental observations. Therefore, we present the construction of the proposed algorithm to localise, recognise and monitor the AP. Furthermore, we discuss the performance of the training algorithm and produce the final algorithmic pseudocode. Also, we implemented the EDDAMAP algorithm through rigorous simulations to attest to its validity in terms of accuracy and query processing speed by considering the efficiency in monitoring the AP alongside with the closely related G2 algorithm.
Experimental setup The EDDAMAP algorithm is implemented on a personal computer (PC) install with a Windows 10 operating system. The specification of the PC includes Intel Core i5 CPU 4.1 GHz and 8.00 GB RAM. Coding is done with Python and all the simulations are done using the Pycharm community version 2.7 software. In the experimentation, we mount scientific software and packages such as Scikit library, Numpy, Microsoft Visio, etc. Nonetheless, it is anticipated that a PC with a higher specification will relatively speed up the execution of the algorithm and produce a fast query result. The training algorithm is deployed and tested with a GPSbased realworld dataset known as GeoLife [35]. An ordinary mobile user is emulated as an Asymptomatic Patient (i.e. AP) who stays in a neighbourhood within a specified community. The AP is considered as performing routine activities such as exercising, shopping, hiking, sightseeing, visit a place of interest and so on [6,36]. In our model, together with the AP, we try to monitor the neighbourhood which is denoted as a rectangle r as the specific location. And that of the community is denoted as R representing the general location under monitoring. The default size of the rectangle is 1000 x 1000 metres squared and that is relatively a very short range to maintain the position accuracy upon executing some query solutions. We define the other parameters in Table 2 and present the graphical results of the simulation in Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. The legends of the graphs show the G2 and EDDAMAP algorithms as G2 and TMAXWS respectively. Note that, monitoring the MaxRS and the related problems are first introduced by Amagata and Hara [9]. Hence, to the best of our knowledge, there are no existing algorithms which can specifically and/or directly handle the MaxRS monitoring problem. Therefore, in this present study, we evaluate our proposed EDDAMAP algorithm and compare it with the G2 algorithm only for being a sufficient incremental approach.
Dataset The GeoLife dataset is a continuousgenerated GPSbased trajectory dataset. We used GeoLife dataset version 1.3 and it is collected by 182 users and/or GPS loggers in more than five years, and thus from April 2007 to August 2012. The trajectories are recorded by different GPS loggers and mobile phones and sampling rates are in varying degree. The densely logged trajectories in a location represent 91.5 per cent in every 1 to 5 seconds and/or every 5 to 10 meters per point. Therefore, the dataset has a broad range of outdoor movements of users such as the usual travels to their residence and workplace. Also, it consists of the activities of the users such as a visit to recreational centres, restaurants, etc. Furthermore, the trajectories are represented by sequences of points with a timestamp, where each of the points contains latitude, longitude and altitude records of the users. However, the altitude is not relevant in our trajectory analysis and hence it is discarded. The number of trajectories is about 17,621 points with a total distance and duration of about 1,292,951 kilometres and 50,176 hours respectively. A reasonable sample of the dataset is used to validate the test for mobility pattern mining of the users and activity recognition with our proposed technique and the related G2 algorithm, and that is due to the larger size and complexities of the dataset.
And thus, the objects (or users) present in the dataset existed over a wider range. Hence, most of the object points, if not all that existed and/or appeared in very sparse areas have to be removed (or ignored). For that matter, we focused on those object points close to the centre of the dataset. The cardinality of the dataset is about 6,134,477 points, and hence the sorting of the objects in the dataset is done based on the time in which they are generated. Consequently, the range of each coordinate is normalized to [0, 100000000] value, whereby the weight of a given object point is randomly chosen from a range of (0, 1000] value. The dataset is considered as a good choice for the testing and evaluation with the algorithms and thus because the proposed technique is aimed at the natural properties of monitoring continuous moving objects in diverse locations. This is because, the dataset is not only widely distributed in about 30 cities of the Peoples Republic of China, but it includes data from the USA and Europe. Furthermore, considering the trajectory pattern that exists in the dataset, its mining and analysis fit well with the aim of our proposed technique. Moreover, the chosen sample dataset includes the number of points that are generated in a location where the user travelled and/or visited. Thereby, a reasonable sample of the object points in the dataset is used to represent a user. Therefore, the user is emulated as an ordinary mobile phone user and/or an asymptomatic patient denoted as AP. GeoLife dataset is a publicly available opensource dataset that is provided by Microsoft Research Asia in Beijing. The details on how to obtain the version 1.3 can be found in the reference [35]. Further details on the GeoLife dataset, including the distribution of the number of trajectories of each user, can be obtained from the original researches [37,38].
Furthermore, we discuss the performance of the proposed EDDAMAP algorithm together with the key related G2 algorithm [9]. Consequently, we simulate both algorithms and present their results as shown in Figs. 8, 9, and 10. The G2 algorithm consists of a general framework for monitoring objects in spatial data streams. However, it is noticed that moving objects exhibit a continuous change in their locations over time. For that matter, the MaxRS query solution for a certain time instant will not be a solution at another time instant. Therefore, we present the proposed EDDAMAP algorithm which possesses continuous monitoring property to handle the evolving data streams environment and to serve also as an improved version of the G2 algorithm. In that regards, the proposed technique can specifically be incorporated into the public health information systems to improve the efficiency challenges that affect patient monitoring systems. As a result of the massive size of the dataset and the computing resources, the test for requirement of the proposed EDDAMAP algorithm has considered the execution time and the space complexities only. Therefore, the algorithms are designed to benefit from the novelty of maximised rangesum problem and further apply to provide a solution to the monitoring problems in general. Heuristically, we can propose that our grid index data structure as provided in Fig. 7 is relatively proven efficient for monitoring naturally occurring phenomena such as location monitoring [24], whereby related approaches suffer from overuse of resources and underexplored design techniques as they usually do not consider the natural dynamics of resources mobility, and for that matter continuous streaming object databases. In this paper, we adopt the parameters n, d and m as shown in Table 2 for the overall evaluation by varying them accordingly as per the features of the position of the user in the dataset. The average computation time is measured for each of the parameters and the overall simulation results are presented in Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12. Moreover, in the experiment, the impact of the number of spatial positions denoted as n in Table 2 (i.e. representing the POIs of the AP) has been tested. It is observed that the computation time for finding each position data increased linearly with increased in position data. This resulted in several overlaps, whereby the OverlapComputation(.) and ExactWeightComputation(.) functions heavily overloaded on execution. This implies that the larger the size of the monitoring location, the more time is needed to produce all the position data to identify the POIs. On the other hand, an increase in the size of the monitoring location affected the speed of generating the POIs, as well as executing the queries for the position of the AP in realtime. This is shown in the graph of running time against user spatial positions size in Fig. 8. The impact of rectangle size denoted as d in Table 2 is tested. This represents the monitoring location which stands for the neighbourhood and/or community of the AP. We observed a skewed distribution, as well as more overlaps in the rectangle as the size increased. As a result, we observed a corresponding increase in the running time of the algorithms. Therefore, it is suggested that, the user should appropriately monitor a sizeable location as possible based on the available resources of the monitoring system. The simulation result which testifies this phenomenon is presented as a graph of running time against user rectangle size as shown in Fig. 9. Again, the impact of the rate of generating position data with time which is denoted as m in Table 2 is tested. Here, we generated less than 50 position data as object points per second, and hence the rate has to be increased further to examine the execution time and space complexities of the algorithms. The simulation result that testifies this phenomenon is presented as a graph of running time against the user generation rate as shown in Fig. 10. Furthermore, the impact of user tolerance which is denoted as tol in Table 2 is evaluated by using the proposed EDDAMAP algorithm. This is to observe the errorrate and computation time when a user is executing the queries. Therefore, to validate the user tolerance denoted as tol, the query time is approximated based on the user preference. Consequently, the running time is seen as indirectly proportional to tol which suggested and/or confirmed that, there is always a tradeoff between the efficiency of query processing and the quality of the query results. This also means that in a practical case the user can adjust the quality of the query results as per the expected outcome of the stay place of the user. Again, the outcome of this phenomenon is presented as a graph of running time against user tolerance as shown in Fig. 11. Also, the impact of generating a top−k (i.e. representing the best POIs) position data is evaluated on the average computation and/or execution time per space that is required to update the results of the query. Here, it is observed that upon increasing the top−k, the execution time proportionately increased. This suggests that the top−k query is directly proportional to the execution time per the search space, and thus when we need to obtain a new position as the POIs. We present the results of the process as a graph of running time against top−k position data as shown in Fig. 12. Therefore, the outcome of the increase in the query execution time suggests that the user does not need to examine the exact query solution and/or results (i.e. identify the exact SP). This will limit the time and space complexities so far as practical application is concerned. Conversely, it is appropriate for the user to approximate the query results and that should be done based on marginal errorrate which is also known as usertolerance tol or preference value. Furthermore, when the user knows the approximated SP that will be enough to an informed decision in practice, and as to whether the AP will have the chance to spread the disease or not. Moreover, it is evidenced that approximation is preferable to that of the exact solution when dealing with realworld applications and/or databases dedicated to streaming objects.
In summary, in this section, we provide the initial evaluation and discuss the proposed EDDAMAP technique and/or algorithm based on complexities of time and space only. Upon executing a query, the outcome of the simulation validates the proposed EDDAMAP technique as having substantially improved the efficiency of monitoring continuous outdoor mobile patient such as the AP in a vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed technique is confirmed as an improved solution for the continuous maximising rangesum problem by comparing it to the key related G2 algorithm. However, some work remain untouched in the present study, such as a test for the scalability and performance with some other related query techniques. Nonetheless, this comparative study is reserved as future work and hence it is open for investigation. The objective of evaluating the algorithm, in terms of the processing time is to validate its efficiency in acquiring a continuously moving object data and to process queries about the present location of objects (e.g. asymptomatic patient) and/or obtaining the position of the object in realtime. The other aspect of the requirement testing includes the errorrate when querying for location and position of objects in the continuous moving object database. Considering the test for the errorrate, the G2 algorithm does not fall into the category of continuous query processing and hence cannot be compared with our algorithm. The objective of using only the realworld data aside the limited resources employed for the study is to attest to the natural occurring property of our algorithm in which the behaviour of the asymptomatic patient is regarded as a key contributing factor to attest to the natural mobility instances and patterns that the asymptomatic patient will have to exhibit along with its travel. Moreover, the overall validation of our proposed algorithm is based on the accuracy test. The accuracy is verified via simulation by taking into consideration the test for the errorrate when querying the present position and/or location of the asymptomatic patient as previously discussed.
Conclusions
In this paper, we address a maximising rangesum problem and relate that to the challenges of monitoring the travels of an outdoor mobile asymptomatic patient and its activities in a community. As a contribution, we further establish an EDDAMAP technique and/or algorithm as a solution to the continuous moving object monitoring problem in general. Our proposed technique determines the locations of a given rectangle denoted as R to represent a community. Such that the number of positions of the outdoor mobile asymptomatic patient that can be obtained from a GPSbased trajectory records will be maximised in R. We derive another specific location denoted as r for a sublocation to represent a neighbourhood in R. The r covers the positions of the asymptomatic patient, and our algorithm is aimed to locate the centroid of r as the place of interests denoted as POIs and/or stay place denoted as SP, depending on the time and nature of activities of the asymptomatic patient in that location and/or neighbourhood. In contrast to the original MaxRS problem, we look at continuous MaxRS query where the query results change over time as the asymptomatic patient keeps moving and/or visiting interesting places over time. To match up with the query processing time, we design a gridbased index data structure as shown in Fig. 7 to ensure efficient continuous monitoring of a change in position and/or location of the asymptomatic patient in realtime. Furthermore, techniques such as branch and bound, current object localisation and recognition and graph theory are adopted to ensure the validity of the proposed design technique and/or algorithm. Our experiment using reallife dataset shows that the proposed technique heuristically will enhance the accuracy and efficiency in monitoring mobile objects in general. Furthermore, it will also enable a significant speed in the overall computation time per space for the upper bound with respect to the location under searching or monitoring. This will help satisfy the time and space complexities problems by considering the location and/or position in the continuous moving object database. The proposed EDDAMAP technique and/or algorithm will promote the discovery of endemic zones as far as a pandemic is concerned via the naturally occurring Spatiotemporal activities of an asymptomatic patient. Nonetheless, the public healthcare setting can also apply the proposed algorithm to facilitate the design and management of multimodal health information systems such as patient monitoring system applications to curtail global pandemic.
In future work, we will look at the enhancement of the theoretical analysis. We will also extend the practical applications of the established technique to more multimodal monitoring systems. Thus, we aim to ensure that the proposed algorithm can handle extra computation and storage by considering the tight upperbound of the maximised weighted rangesum of the POIs in every location. In this manner, the EDDAMAP algorithm will be able to handle queries of multiple instances to enhance its scalability and performance. It is our extra hope to intensify this burgeoning trajectory data mining technique in the research community and the industry.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are publicly available from Microsoft Asia Beijing website or request as to how to access the data should be sent to the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
 AP:

Asymptomatic patient
 EDDAMAP:

Efficient datadependent approach for monitoring asymptomatic patient
 PMS:

patient monitoring system
 GPS:

Global positioning system
 POIs:

Place/Point of interests
 SP:

Stay place
 SPL:

Singlepoint location
 MPL:

Singlepoint location
 SVM:

Supportvector machine
 G2:

Graph in grid index
 TMaxWS:

Trajectory maximisedweighted sum
 PC:

Personal computer
References
 1
Crepaldi NY, de Lima IB, Vicentine FB, Rodrigues LML, Sanches TLM, RuffinoNetto A, Alves D, Rijo RPCL. Towards a clinical trial protocol to evaluate health information systems: evaluation of a computerized system for monitoring tuberculosis from a patient perspective in Brazil. J Med Syst. 2018; 42(6):113.
 2
Hassan MM, Huda S, Uddin MZ, Almogren A, Alrubaian M. Human activity recognition from body sensor data using deep learning. J Med Syst. 2018; 42(6):99.
 3
Gonzalez MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabasi AL. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature. 2008; 453:779–82.
 4
Beltrame T, Amelard R, Wong A, Hughson RL. Extracting aerobic system dynamics during unsupervised activities of daily living using wearable sensor machine learning models. J Appl Physiol. 2018; 124:473–81. https://0doiorg.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1152/japplphysiol.00299.2017.
 5
Nogueira P, Urbano J, Reis LP, Cardoso HL, Silva DC, Rocha AP, Gonçalves J, Faria BM. A review of commercial and medicalgrade physiological monitoring devices for biofeedbackassisted quality of life improvement studies. J Med Syst. 2018; 42(6):101.
 6
AduGyamfi D, Zhou F, Zhang F, Kibiwott KP, Tattrah VD. Realtime monitoring of mobile user using trajectory data mining* In: Sengodan T, et al, editors. 2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies. IEEE: 2019. p. 1–8.
 7
ElSappagh S, Ali F, Hendawi A, Jang JH, Kwak KS. A mobile health monitoringandtreatment system based on integration of the SSN sensor ontology and the HL7 FHIR standard. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19(1):97.
 8
Esposito M, Minutolo A, Megna R, Forastiere M, Magliulo M, De Pietro G. A smart mobile, selfconfiguring, contextaware architecture for personal health monitoring. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2018; 67:136–56.
 9
Amagata D, Hara T. A general framework for MaxRS and MaxCRS monitoring in spatial data streams. ACM Trans Spat Algorithm Syst. 2017; 3(1):1–34.
 10
Zhang P, Deng M, Shi Y, Zhao L. Detecting hotspots of urban residents’ behaviours based on spatiotemporal clustering techniques. GeoJournal. 2017; 82(5):923–35.
 11
Qiu W, Bandura A. GPS trace mining for discovering behaviour patterns. In: 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Environments: 2015. p. 65–72, IEEE.
 12
Hussain MM, Trajcevski G, Islam KA, Ali ME. Towards efficient maintenance of continuous maxrs query for trajectories. In: 20th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT). OpenProceedings.org; 2017. p. 402–13.
 13
Zheng VW, Zheng Y, Xie X, Yang Q. Towards mobile intelligence: Learning from GPS history data for collaborative recommendation. Artif Intell. 2012; 184:17–37.
 14
Or C, Tong E, Tan J, Chan S. Exploring factors affecting voluntary adoption of electronic medical records among physicians and clinical assistants of small or solo private general practice clinics. J Med Syst. 2018; 42:121.
 15
Rajkumar S, Muttan S, Sapthagirivasan V, Jaya V, Vignesh SS. Development of improved software intelligent system for audiological solutions. J Med Syst. 2018; 42:127.
 16
Singh D, Merdivan E, Psychoula I, Kropf J, Hanke S, Geist M, et al. Human activity recognition using recurrent neural networks In: Holzinger A, Kieseberg P, Tjoa A, Weippl E, editors. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. CDMAKE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer: 2017. p. 267–74.
 17
Wu R, Luo G, Shao J, Tian L, Peng C. Location prediction on trajectory data: A review. Big Data Min Analytics. 2018; 1:108–27.
 18
MoralMunoz JA, EstebanMoreno B, HerreraViedma E, Cobo MJ, Perez IJ. Smartphone applications to perform body balance assessment: a standardized review. J Med Syst. 2018; 42:119.
 19
Lee S, Holzinger A. Knowledge discovery from complex high dimensional data In: Michaelis S, Piatkowski N, Stolpe M, editors. Solving Large Scale Learning Tasks: Challenges and Algorithms. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 2016. p. 148–67.
 20
Pawar P, Jones V, van Beijnum BJF, Hermens H. A framework for the comparison of mobile patient monitoring systems. J Biomed Inform. 2012; 45(3):544–56.
 21
Yu Z. Trajectory data mining: An overview. ACM Trans Intell Syst Tech. 2015; 6:1–41.
 22
Yeh T, Lee JJ, Darrell T. Fast concurrent object localization and recognition. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 2009. p. 280–7.
 23
Lettich F, Orlando S, Silvestri C. Processing streams of spatial kNN queries and position updates on manycore GPUs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems: 2015. p. 1–10. SIGSPATIAL 15.
 24
Costa C, Chatzimilioudis G, ZeinalipourYazti D, Mokbel MF. Efficient exploration of telco big data with compression and decaying. In: 2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: 2017. p. 1332–43.
 25
Yang Y, Du B, Jiang X. A human trajectory estimate based on individual mobility pattern library. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing. IEEE: 2013. p. 1181–5.
 26
Giannotti F, Nanni M, Pedreschi D, Renso C, Trasarti R. Mining mobility behavior from trajectory data. In: 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. IEEE: 2009. p. 948–51.
 27
AduGyamfi D, Zhang F, Zhou F. Finding influential location via user mobility and trajectory In: Sengodan T, et al, editors. Advances in Electrical and Computer Technologies. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: 2020. p. 233–46.
 28
Lampert CH, Blaschko MB, Hofmann T. Beyond sliding windows: Object localization by efficient subwindow search. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 2008. p. 1–8.
 29
Hu H, Zhai X, Wang M, Hu G. Graph analysis of network flow connectivity behaviors. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 2019; 27:861–77.
 30
Bakalov P, Tsotras VJ. Continuous spatiotemporal trajectory joins In: Nittel S, Labrinidis A, Stefanidis A, editors. International Conference on GeoSensor Networks. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 2008. p. 109–28.
 31
Feng Y, Ji M, Xiao J, Yang X, Zhang JJ, Zhuang Y, Li X. Mining spatialtemporal patterns and structural sparsity for human motion data denoising. IEEE Trans Cybernet. 2015; 45:2693–706.
 32
Li F, Long X, Du S, Zhang J, Liu Z, Li M, Gui Z, Yu H. Analyzing campus mobility patterns of college students by using GPS trajectory data and graph based approach. In: 2015 23rd International Conference on Geoinformatics: 2015. p. 1–5.
 33
Ebadi N, Kang JE, Hasan S. Constructing activitymobility trajectories of college students based on smart card transaction data. Int J Transp Sci Tech. 2017; 6:316–29.
 34
Cho E, Myers SA, Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility: User movement in locationbased social networks. In: 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 2011. p. 1082–90.
 35
Zheng Y, Xie X, Ma WY. GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Eng Bull. 2010; 33(2):32–9.
 36
AduGyamfi D, Zhang F. Towards derail of global pandemics via patient trajectory. J Appl Sci Eng. 2020; 23:413–23.
 37
Zheng Y, Zhang L, Xie X, Ma WY. Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories. In: International Conference on World Wild Web (WWW). ACM Press: 2009. p. 791–800.
 38
Zheng Y, Li Q, Chen Y, Xie X, Ma WY. Understanding mobility based on GPS data. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM Press: 2008. p. 312–21.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No.61602097, No.61502087, and No.61472064].
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors participated in the method, design and implementation processes of this manuscript. All the authors participated in drafting and revising the manuscript. For specific contributions, DAG obtained and managed the data. DAG, FZ and AKKA carried out the data analysis and interpretation. DAG carried out the literature searches and final manuscript writing. FZ had the final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The funding agency had no part in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or drafting the manuscript. Final approval of the manuscript version to be submitted was given by all the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
AduGyamfi, D., Zhang, F. & Kwansah Ansah, A. EDDAMAP: efficient datadependent approach for monitoring asymptomatic patient. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20, 245 (2020). https://0doiorg.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s1291102001258z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://0doiorg.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s1291102001258z
Keywords
 Asymptomatic patient
 Datadependent technique
 Health decisionsupport system
 Pandemic
 Patient monitoring system
 Place of interests
 Preventive intervention
 Public health
 Stay place
 Trajectory data mining