Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparing the performance of CNFE-SE with other state of the art classifiers

From: CNFE-SE: a novel approach combining complex network-based feature engineering and stacked ensemble to predict the success of intrauterine insemination and ranking the features

Feature set

Classifier

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

AUC

F Score

All 296 features

RF

0.58 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.05

0.46 ± 0.06

0.58 ± 0.01

0.55 ± 0.05

 

DT

0.55 ± 0.01

0.62 ± 0.04

0.49 ± 0.04

0.55 ± 0.01

0.55 ± 0.04

 

NB

0.53 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.11

0.26 ± 0.12

0.54 ± 0.01

0.39 ± 0.11

 

ANN

0.50 ± 0.01

0.54 ± 0.16

0.45 ± 0.16

0.50 ± 0.01

0.49 ± 0.16

 

SVM

0.54 ± 0.01

0.28 ± 0.1

0.8 ± 0.09

0.56 ± 0.01

0.41 ± 0.05

 

XGboost

0.55 ± 0.01

0.53 ± 0.03

0.56 ± 0.03

0.55 ± 0.01

0.54 ± 0.03

 

LGBM

0.60 ± 0.01

0.59 ± 0.03

0.59 ± 0.01

0.64 ± 0.01

0.59 ± 0.02

 

Adaboost

0.59 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.02

0.48 ± 0.02

0.60 ± 0.01

0.56 ± 0.02

 

CNFE-SE without FE

0.71 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.01

0.73 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

 

CNFE-SE with FE

0.85 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.01

0.91 ± 0.01

0.84 ± 0.01

0.85 ± 0.01

Only most important features

RF

0.60 ± 0.02

0.69 ± 0.03

0.50 ± 0.02

0.59 ± 0.02

0.60 ± 0.02

 

DT

0.57 ± 0.03

0.63 ± 0.01

0.54 ± 0.04

0.57 ± 0.02

0.58 ± 0.03

 

NB

0.54 ± 0.01

0.52 ± 0.01

0.57 ± 0.01

0.54 ± 0.01

0.54 ± 0.01

 

ANN

0.54 ± 0.01

0.55 ± 0.01

0.52 ± 0.01

0.53 ± 0.01

0.53 ± 0.01

 

SVM

0.58 ± 0.01

0.51 ± 0.01

0.70 ± 0.01

0.60 ± 0.01

0.61 ± 0.01

 

XGboost

0.58 ± 0.01

0.57 ± 0.01

0.59 ± 0.01

0.58 ± 0.02

0.58 ± 0.01

 

LGBM

0.62 ± 0.02

0.61 ± 0.02

0.63 ± 0.03

0.62 ± 0.02

0.62 ± 0.02

 

Adaboost

0.62 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.01

0.51 ± 0.01

0.61 ± 0.01

0.60 ± 0.01

 

CNFE-SE without FE

0.72 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.74 ± 0.01

0.72 ± 0.01

0.72 ± 0.01

 

CNFE-SE with FE

0.87 ± 0.01

0.82 ± 0.01

0.92 ± 0.01

0.87 ± 0.01

0.87 ± 0.01