Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Fig. 3

From: Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study

Fig. 3

Perceptive performance in the 10-s scenarios. The dotted lines represent the median number of correctly perceived vital signs, which was 11 with avatar-based monitoring and 7 with conventional monitoring (paired Student’s t-test, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval of the mean difference = 2 to 6 vital signs, effect size d = 0.67)

Back to article page