Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of performance of the proposed method with existing works

From: A combination of 3-D discrete wavelet transform and 3-D local binary pattern for classification of mild cognitive impairment

 

Method

Accuracy (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

MCI-C vs. MCI-NC

Colliot et al. 2008 [13]

66

66

65

Chupin et al. 2009 [15]

 

65

68

Andrea Chincarini et.al., 2011 [16]

_

72

65

Chong-Yaw Wee et.al., 2013 [19].

75.05

63.52

84.41

Tong Tong et al., 2014 [20].

72

69

74

Suk et al. 2014 [21]

72.42

36.70

90.98

Liu et al. 2018 [24]

72.08

75.11

71.05

3D-DWT + LBP12

0.8877

0.8916

0.9016

MCI vs. CN

Pennanen et al.2004 [12]

65.9

66.2

65.5

Chupin et al. 2009 [15]

 

75

74

Carlton Chu et al., 2011 [17]

67.3

_

_

Chong-Yaw Wee et.al., 2013 [19].

92.33

83.55

83.95

Suk et al. 2014 [21]

84.24

99.58

53.79

Ahmed et al. 2015 [23]

78.22

70.73

83.34

Khedher et al. 2015 [22]

80.27

73.51

82.70

Liu et al. 2018 [24]

85.79

88.91

80.34

Proposed Model

0.9031

0.9015

0.9022