Skip to main content

Table 3 The performance of the prediction models based on different classifications on the independent tests for two ratios

From: A machine learning classifier approach for identifying the determinants of under-five child undernutrition in Ethiopian administrative zones

Train/test ratios

Algorithms

Sensitivity

Specificity

Precision

F1

AUC (95% CI)

Accuracy (95% CI)

80/20

GLM

0.585

0.169

0.399

0.475

0.630 (0.619, 0.641)

0.371 (0.359, 0.383)

Ridge

0.503

0.789

0.683

0.580

0.699 (0.686, 0.713)

0.645 (0.633, 0.658)

Lasso

0.484

0.814

0.711

0.576

0.711 (0.698, 0.724)

0.654 (0.641, 0.666)

elastic-net

0.484

0.802

0.697

0.572

0.701 (0.689, 0.714)

0.647 (0.635, 0.660)

NN

0.499

0.785

0.686

578

0.697 (0.684, 0.711)

0.646 (0.634, 0.658)

RF

0.524

0.819

0.732

0.611

0.756 (0.744, 0.769)

0.676 (0.663, 0.688)

70/30

GLM

0.601

0.189

0.361

0.445

0.653 (0.639, 0.667)

0.356 (0.344, 0.369)

Ridge

0.510

0.804

0.743

0.604

0.703 (0.690, 0.717)

0.649 (0.636, 0.661)

Lasso

0.516

0.819

0.698

0.593

0.717 (0.704, 0.730)

0.683 (0.671, 0.695)

Elastic-net

0.527

0.824

0.717

0.608

0.720 (0.707, 0.733)

0.682 (0.670, 0.694)

NN

0.499

0.785

0.751

0.621

0.701 (0.688, 0.715)

0.656 (0.644, 0.668)

RF

0.524

0.819

0.715

0.595

0.761 (0.749, 0.773)

0.688 (0.676, 0.700)