Skip to main content

Table 4 Average classification results for the evaluated methods. Results are presented in the format of mean percentage value ± SD at 95% confidence interval

From: Combining unsupervised, supervised and rule-based learning: the case of detecting patient allergies in electronic health records

Method

Precision

Recall

F-measure

Naïve Bayes

66.4 ± 1.7

70.5 ± 2.0

68.4 ± 1.6

Logistic regression

69.0 ± 1.8

59.6 ± 1.9

64.0 ± 1.5

Decision tree

64.7 ± 1.8

61.2 ± 2.4

62.9 ± 1.7

Random forest

62.8 ± 2.0

54.8 ± 2.0

58.5 ± 1.7

kNN

53.5 ± 3.2

29.1 ± 2.1

37.7 ± 2.3

SVM

66.7 ± 2.0

53.7 ± 2.0

59.5 ± 1.6

MLP

62.1 ± 2.1

61.9 ± 2.3

62.0 ± 1.6

StarSpace

62.4 ± 1.9

63.8 ± 2.2

63.5 ± 2.0

LSTM

63.9 ± 1.1

64.3 ± 1.3

64.1 ± 1.0

1D-CNN

69.3 ± 1.8

67.9 ± 1.6

68.6 ± 1.7

LSTM CNN

62.3 ± 1.9

62.7 ± 1.4

62.3 ± 1.7

Bi-LSTM

65.9 ± 1.5

65.2 ± 1.5

65.6 ± 1.5

Bi-LSTM CNN

64.1 ± 1.4

64.0 ± 1.4

64.1 ± 1.4

Bi-LSTM Attention

66.5 ± 2.1

67.2 ± 1.5

66.7 ± 1.9

GRU

65.5 ± 1.5

65.1 ± 1.5

65.3 ± 1.5

CNN 1D + fastText Skip-Gram 100 dims

60.7 ± 1.7

59.1 ± 1.3

59.9 ± 1.5

CNN 1D + fastText Skip-Gram 300 dims

63.3 ± 1.3

63.1 ± 1.4

63.2 ± 1.3

CNN 1D + fastText CBOW 100 dims

66.1 ± 1.3

63.9 ± 1.3

65.7 ± 1.2

CNN 1D + fastText CBOW 300 dims

74.2 ± 1.5

74.1 ± 1.5

74.1 ± 1.5

CNN 1D + Word2Vec Skip-Gram 100 dims

63.5 ± 1.9

61.5 ± 1.4

62.4 ± 1.7

CNN 1D + Word2Vec Skip-Gram 300 dims

70.7 ± 1.5

69.5 ± 1.4

70.1 ± 1.3

CNN 1D + Word2Vec CBOW 100 dims

61.7 ± 2.2

57.5 ± 1.0

59.2 ± 1.5

CNN 1D + Word2Vec CBOW 300 dims

66.1 ± 1.7

64.1 ± 1.3

64.5 ± 1.5

CNN 1D + Glove 100 dims

67.2 ± 1.3

67.2 ± 1.2

67.2 ± 1.2

CNN 1D + Glove 300 dims

71.3 ± 1.1

69.3 ± 1.3

70.3 ± 1.2

CNN 1D + StarSpace 100 dims

64.6 ± 1.5

63.0 ± 1.5

63.7 ± 1.4

CNN 1D + StarSpace 300 dims

70 ± 1.6

68.1 ± 1.6

68.9 ± 1.6

Our combined method

92.6 ± 4.2

97.9 ± 2.4

95.1 ± 2.5