Skip to main content

Table 1 The prediction results from the internal validation (healthcare center dataset) to detect epiretinal membrane in fundus photographs

From: Development of a generative deep learning model to improve epiretinal membrane detection in fundus photography

CNN architectures

Training set

ROC-AUC (95% CI)

Sensitivity (%, 95% CI)

Specificity (%, 95% CI)

PPV (%, 95% CI)

NPV (%, 95% CI)

ResNet50

Original set (no augmentation)

0.766 (0.702–0.830)

71.4 (58.6–82.1)

70.4 (64.3–75.9)

37.8 (32.2–43.7)

90.7 (86.7–93.6)

Original set + classic augmentationa

0.827 (0.780–0.867)

92.1 (82.4–97.4)

58.0 (51.6–64.2)

35.6 (31.9–39.4)

96.7 (92.5–98.5)

Original set + DCGAN

0.850 (0.798–0.902)

90.4 (80.4–96.4)

63.6 (57.3–69.5)

38.5 (34.2–42.9)

96.3 (92.4–98.2)

Original set + CycleGAN

0.859 (0.803–0.914)

79.3 (67.3–88.5)

78.8 (73.2–83.6)

48.5 (41.8–55.2)

93.8 (90.2–96.1)

Original set + StyleGAN2

0.913 (0.872–0.954)

90.4 (80.4–96.4)

75.6 (69.7–80.7)

48.3 (42.5–54.1)

96.9 (93.6–98.5)

EfficientNetB0

Original set (no augmentation)

0.796 (0.736–0.855)

71.4 (58.6–82.1)

71.6 (65.5–77.1)

38.7 (33.0–44.8)

90.8 (86.9–93.6)

Original set + classic augmentationa

0.833 (0.786–0.872)

88.9 (78.4–95.4)

62.4 (56.1–68.4)

37.3 (33.2–41.6)

95.7 (91.7–97.8)

Original set + DCGAN

0.821 (0.756–0.887)

65.0 (52.0–76.6)

88.4 (83.7–92.0)

58.5 (48.9–67.5)

90.9 (87.7–93.3)

Original set + CycleGAN

0.875 (0.821–0.929)

71.4 (58.6–82.1)

90.4 (86.0–93.7)

65.2 (55.4–73.8)

92.6 (89.4–94.8)

Original set + StyleGAN2

0.926 (0.890–0.963)

92.0 (82.4–97.3)

80.8 (75.3–85.4)

54.7 (48.1–61.1)

97.5 (94.5–98.9)

  1. CI confidence interval, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, ROC-AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
  2. aWe oversample the ERM class to balance the training dataset