Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Fat mass: a novel digital biomarker for remote monitoring that may indicate risk for malnutrition and new complications in decompensated cirrhosis

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making volume 23, Article number: 180 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cirrhosis is associated with sarcopaenia and fat wasting, which drive decompensation and mortality. Currently, nutritional status, through body composition assessment, is not routinely monitored in outpatients. Given the deleterious outcomes associated with poor nutrition in decompensated cirrhosis, there is a need for remotely monitoring this to optimise community care.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients monitored remotely with digital sensors post hospital discharge, to assess outcomes and indicators of new cirrhosis complications. 15 patients had daily fat mass measurements as part of monitoring over a median 10 weeks, using a Withing’s bioimpedance scale. The Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) was used to assess frailty and several liver disease severity scores were assessed.

Results

73.3% (11/15) patients were male with a median age of 63 (52–68). There was a trend towards more severe liver disease based on CLIF-Consortium Acute Decompensation (CLIF-C AD) scores in frail patients vs. those not frail (53 vs 46, p = 0.072). When the cohort was split into patients who gained fat mass over 8 weeks vs. those that lost fat mass, the baseline CLIF-C AD scores and WBC were significantly higher in those that lost fat (58 vs 48, p = 0.048 and 11.2 × 109 vs 4.7 × 109, p = 0.031).

Conclusions

This proof-of-principle study shows feasibility for remote monitoring of fat mass and nutritional reserve in decompensated cirrhosis. Our results suggest fat mass is associated with greater severity of acute decompensation and may serve as an indicator of systemic inflammatory response. Further prospective studies are required to validate this digital biomarker.

Peer Review reports

Background

Malnutrition has been estimated to be present in 20% of patients with compensated cirrhosis and between 60–90% of individuals with decompensated cirrhosis (defined by the development of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), gastrointestinal bleeding or bacterial infection) [1,2,3] This is due to reduced dietary intake secondary to anorexigenic effects of inflammatory cytokines and malabsorption secondary to impacts on the gut through portal hypertension, resulting in increased lipolysis of fat and proteolysis of skeletal muscle [4, 5]. These effects lead to fat wasting and sarcopenia, named protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). The group of particular concern are those with decompensated cirrhosis where median survival reduces from 10 to 2 years compared to individuals who are compensated, and re-admission rates following acute decompensation are as high as 30–50% [6,7,8].

PEM has been associated with increased mortality and as well as decompensation events in the form of ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, and HE in patients with liver cirrhosis [9,10,11]. This effect is partly due to a loss of muscle mass which is termed sarcopaenia [12]. Sarcopaenia is a surrogate marker for severe malnutrition and a dominant component of frailty [13]. As well as muscle depletion, loss of fat mass is likely to be important, with evidence showing it may be protective against sarcopaenia as an alternative essential energy source [14]. Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that in earlier stages of cirrhosis it is predominantly fat wasting that occurs, which may drive the muscle depletion in more advanced stages of the disease [15].

Given the morbidity and mortality associated with malnutrition in liver cirrhosis, regular nutritional assessment is imperative. However, this is often resource heavy, time-consuming, and often difficult to prioritise in an overstretched healthcare system, especially in the outpatient setting. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the reference standard for nutritional assessment but is often unavailable, expensive and uses ionising radiation, whereas anthropometric measures often underestimate malnutrition in this population [16]. The utility of remote monitoring has not been evaluated in this area and is in keeping the NHS long term plan to digitise health care and deliver sustainable healthcare into the community [17].

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is a quick, convenient, and cost-effective way of measuring body composition and has demonstrated accuracy in the cirrhotic population [16, 18] BIA provides fat mass (FM) and fat-free tissue mass (FFM) and works on the principle that electrical conductivity is reduced in fat tissue due to increased resistance (impedance), in contrast to FFM which has much more rapid conduction [19] Studies that have assessed BIA in liver cirrhosis have tended to do assessments at a single time point. This is the first study to assess whether regular monitoring of fat mass remotely in the community, could be used as a biomarker to assess patients with greater risk of new cirrhosis complications.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients being remotely monitored at the Royal Free Hospital between August-December 2020, with CirrhoCare, in partnership with CyberLiver Limited [20]. 20 patients were monitored remotely for 12 weeks post hospital discharge for acute cirrhosis decompensation. This was the first ever study of digital, multi-modal monitoring, at home for management of advanced cirrhosis. It involved monitoring a range of vital signs (sensor-technology), fluid balance (bioimpedance-scale) and higher mental function (smartphone-app) in the patient's home, all key metrics perturbed in advanced cirrhosis. The data was uploaded in real-time securely to CyberLiver’s secure cloud and platform. The actionable, decision-assisted, analytical algorithms, then suggested interventions on a clinician dashboard (assessing clinical outcomes), for community-based therapy.

BIA data was obtained using a Withing’s bioimpedance scale. Participants were prompted via the CirrhoCare App to measure their weight and body composition at the same time every day, by standing in the centre of the scales in bare feet and minimal clothing. The scales provided measurements of total weight, fat mass, muscle mass, bone mass and hydration status. The average of all fat mass measurements taken during the 1st week of the study for each participant was calculated to provide an average week 1 fat mass. The same was done for week 8 to calculate a week 8 fat mass. Food intake data was collected through self-reporting. Patients entered the number of cooked meals and number of total meals they had daily. Alcohol intake during the study period, if applicable, was also recorded.

The Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) was used to assess frailty with a score of 5 or more being used to define frailty, which is consistent with the literature [21, 22]. Sarcopaenia was assessed by the Skeletal Mass Index (SMI) from CT imaging either during admission or < 3 months prior to admission [23]. SMI has been validated and gives a robust measure of whole-body muscle mass by measuring the cross-sectional area of muscle at the level of the third lumbar vertebrate (L3), normalized to the patient’s height. Sarcopaenia was defined as per the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines (SMI: men < 50cm2/m2, women < 39cm2/m2) [12].

Each participant had routine face-to face clinical assessments and blood tests performed at baseline and end of participation. Clinical examination was also undertaken including assessments of frailty and cirrhosis decompensation. Liver severity scores: Child–Pugh (CP), Model-For-End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and EF-CLIF Acute Decompensation score (CLIF-C AD) were then calculated at baseline and follow-up [2, 24, 25]. Information regarding any clinically significant events or hospital re-admissions during the trial period were also obtained.

Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software. A non-parametric assumption was used for all statistical tests. A Pearson’s chi-squared was used to test for statistically significant differences in nominal or ordinal data and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous data. Spearman’s test was used to assess for correlations.

Results

Fifteen patients were included for analysis with complete BIA data available for 8 weeks. Table 1 shows a summary of their baseline characteristics. Most patients were male (73.3%) with a median age of 63 (IQR 52–68). The underlying aetiology of liver cirrhosis in the majority was alcohol (80%). All patients had ascites to varying degrees at recruitment with only 1 individual diagnosed with refractory ascites. 6/15 (40%) patients had low-grade HE at baseline (grade 1), with all individuals assessed as having the capacity to participate in the monitoring program by the investigating team.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants
Full size table

Bioimpedance data

BIA data provided total body weight values which were the sum of fat mass, bone mass, and muscle mass with hydration status determined separately. As muscle mass trends directly mirrored hydration, and muscle is the only hydrous element of the three body compartments, it was concluded that the muscle mass component also included total body water. The values for muscle mass were therefore deemed unreliable as liver cirrhosis patients often have significant fluid accumulation, and therefore this was not analysed. Bone mass trends were also found to be influenced by trends in hydration and so analysis of trends in this component was not undertaken. Although bone is an anhydrous body compartment, it is a very small mass in comparison to hydration, and as such, readings may have been affected by large fluid shifts which do occur in this population. By contrast, fat mass trends did not mirror hydration trends and were, therefore, used for analysis.

Frailty

8/15 (53.3%) of patients were defined as frail. The median CFS score was 5 (IQR 5–5.5) in the frail group vs 3 (IQR 3–4) in the non-frail group. The body mass index (BMI) was similar across both groups (24.8 vs 25.1) with no significant differences in admission white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), Albumin, Urea and Creatinine (Cr) noted. The admission CLIF-C AD showed a trend towards being higher in the frail cohort compared to the non-frail group (53 (IQR 48.5–59.0) vs 46 (IQR 43.7–51.2), p = 0.072). In addition, 3/15 patients had hospital re-admissions during the study period due to decompensation of cirrhosis and all these individuals were frail.

The average week 1 and week 8 fat masses were higher in the non-frail cohort in comparison to the frail cohort (17.1 vs 13.0 kg, 17.9 vs 14.6 kg respectively), although this was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in change in fat mass over the study period for the two groups.

Sarcopaenia

9/15 patients had CT imaging available for assessment of sarcopenia within the specified time frame. 6/9 (66.7%) patients had sarcopaenia based on the AASLD guidelines imaging criteria [12]. Baseline BMI was significantly lower in the sarcopaenic group vs non-sarcopaenic group (23 vs 28 kg/m2, p = 0.048). In addition, there was a trend towards a lower creatinine in the sarcopaenic group (74 vs 99 μmol/L, p = 0.09). Whilst median CLIF-C AD score was higher in the sarcopaenic cohort, this was not statistically significant (53 vs 47). There were no other significant differences in baseline blood results and hospital re-admission rates between the two groups.

The average week 1 and week 8 fat masses were lower in the sarcopaenic group (12.5 vs 17.1 kg, 13.8 vs 17.9 kg respectively). The sarcopaenic cohort gained 1.44 kg over the study period compared to 0.8 kg in the non-sarcopaenic group which corresponded with a higher number of cooked meals (2.5 vs 1) and total meals (3 vs 2) per day. However, none of these changes were significant.

Fat mass changes

A comparative analysis was performed between those individuals that gained fat mass during the 8-week study period vs. those that lost fat mass (12 vs 3 participants). There was no significant difference between the number of meals and cooked meals per day between the two groups (2.5 vs 2 and 1.5 vs 2). In addition, no difference in frailty was noted across the two groups with the median CFS score being 5 in both groups. No significant correlations were noted between week 1, week 8 and change in fat mass in relation to admission blood test results, sex or liver disease severity scores.

Admission CLIF-C AD score and WBC were significantly higher in individuals who lost fat compared to those who gained fat (58 vs 48, p = 0.048 and 11.2 vs 5.0, p = 0.031), which can be seen in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Graphs showing differences in admission CLIF-C AD scores (1A) and admission WBC (1B) in individuals who lost weight over 8 weeks versus those who gained weight

Full size image

Discussion

This study demonstrates that BIA data can be obtained accurately and remotely in the decompensated cirrhosis population over a 3-month time period. BIA has previously been studied in the cirrhotic population and has demonstrated that it could play an important role in nutritional assessment as well as correlating with mortality [26,27,28]. However, these studies have predominantly assessed FFM (bone, muscle, and total body water) and only at a single time point. This pilot study is the first to demonstrate the potential benefit of monitoring fat mass in this population and shows that it can be monitored accurately in the patient’s home on a daily basis. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis frequently suffer from complications such as ascites and peripheral oedema, with significant fluid shifts following abdominal paracentesis. There is concern in the field about fluid retention affecting the accuracy of BIA results, although some studies have demonstrated it can be used in patients with ascites [26,27,28,29]. Indeed, in this study muscle and bone mass tended to mirror hydration status and, therefore, were not analysed as they were felt to be inaccurate. By comparison, fat mass was not affected by hydration status, and therefore would seem to be the ideal component of BIA analysis to use in the decompensated cirrhosis population.

Frailty is a broad syndrome which involves decreased physiological reserve, resulting in increased vulnerability to health stressors and predisposes to adverse health outcomes [30]. In cirrhosis, there has been a tendency to focus on physical frailty as opposed to the traditional care-of the elderly definition, which is more of a global construct [12]. 53.3% of patients is this study were defined as frail which is higher that the 17–43% reported in the literature [31, 32]. This is potentially because patients were recruited to this study following an admission with an acute decompensation of cirrhosis and, therefore, were likely to be deconditioned with more advanced disease. Indeed, all hospital re-admissions were in the frail cohort and there was a trend towards higher recruitment CLIF-AD scores in comparison to the non-frail individuals. This aligns with the literature which shows that frailty is associated with increased morbidity and cirrhosis complications [33, 34].

The proportion of sarcopaenic patients in the study is consistent with the literature which suggests an incidence of 30–70% [35]. Our results show that the sarcopaenic group had a significantly lower creatinine than the non-sarcopaenic group. This is not surprising given that skeletal muscle mass is the main determining factor of creatinine generation and therefore a low muscle mass would lead to reduced creatinine levels [36]. Lower week 1 and week 8 average fat masses were also noted in the sarcopaenic group, although non-significant, which is potentially due to the small sample size. This is logical given the link between protein and lipid metabolism. Cirrhosis is a condition with impaired responses to fasting and accelerated starvation responses. Sarcopaenia results in reduced metabolic reserves and in order to preserve muscle, adipose tissue is metabolised preferentially [37]. Indeed, there is evidence that preventing fat wasting may be protective against sarcopaenia [14]. The lower combined muscle and fat mass in the sarcopaenic cohort would explain why this cohort had a significantly lower BMI than the non-sarcopenic group. We did not demonstrate any significant difference in weight change and meal intake over the study period in the sarcopaenic vs non-sarcopaenic cohort. Although we are not able to prove this, we theorise that regular monitoring did have a positive impact on patient behaviour including diet this would need to be explored in further prospective studies.

This study demonstrated that both admission WBC and CLIF-C AD score were significantly higher in those individuals that lost fat mass over the study period compared to those who gained it. This is not necessarily surprising as it is known that decompensated cirrhosis is associated with systemic inflammation and this progresses with liver disease severity [3, 38]. It is also known that that this hyperinflammatory state is an energetically expensive process [39]. This higher level of catabolism with increasing liver disease severity is associated with increased mobilisation and oxidation of fat substrates and higher levels of PEM [40, 41]. It therefore follows that those with more severe liver disease are more likely to lose fat mass over time. Whilst this theory is established in the literature, previous studies have tended to assess fat mass at a single time point. This seems to be the first study to demonstrate this relationship in the decompensated cirrhosis population with regular fat mass monitoring in the community, and suggests this could be used as a biomarker, to assess disease stability or/and response to management.

The main limitation of this study is that it draws upon a small sample size, and over a 10–12 week study duration. It would have also been advantageous to have another formal nutritional assessment at baseline, such as anthropometry or DEXA scan for comparison, albeit these were not within the CirrhoCare study protocol, from which the data for analysis was derived. In addition, whilst there has been some concern about the accuracy of BIA in the cirrhosis population due to fluctuating hydration status, this has already been addressed earlier in the discussion. Whilst fluctuations in hydration seemed to alter muscle and bone mass, fat mass seemed to be unaffected in our population.

In conclusions, this pilot study shows feasibility for remotely monitoring of fat mass and nutritional reserve in decompensated cirrhosis. Our results suggest that fat mass is associated with the severity of acute decompensation and may serve as an indicator of systemic inflammatory response. BIA is ideal to monitor fat mass, as it is safe, rapid, and requires little to no training and can be repeated. Further prospective studies are required to validate this digital biomarker in identifying and helping prevent malnutrition in this vulnerable cirrhosis population with a high morbidity and mortality.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

BIA:

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

BMI:

Body mass index

CFS:

Clinical Frailty Score

CLIF-C AD:

EF-CLIF Acute Decompensation score

CP:

Child–Pugh

Cr:

Creatinine

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DEXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

FF:

Fat mass

FFM:

Fat-free tissue mass

HE:

Hepatic encephalopathy

L3:

Third lumbar vertebrate

MELD:

Model-For-End-Stage Liver Disease

PEM:

Protein-energy malnutrition

SMI:

Skeletal Mass Index

WBC:

White blood cells

References

  1. British Liver Trust. UK Malnutrition Week 2019: Liver disease and malnutrition. https://britishlivertrust.org.uk/uk-malnutrition-week-2019-liver-disease-and-malnutrition/. 2019.

  2. Jalan R, Pavesi M, Saliba F, Amorós A, Fernandez J, Holland-Fischer P, et al. The CLIF Consortium Acute Decompensation score (CLIF-C ADs) for prognosis of hospitalised cirrhotic patients without acute-on-chronic liver failure. J Hepatol. 2015;62(4):831–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P, Pavesi M, Angeli P, Cordoba J, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(7):1426-1437.e9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer F, Bannert K, Wiese M, Esau S, Sautter LF, Ehlers L, et al. Molecular mechanism contributing to malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lautz HU, Selberg O, Körber J, Bürger M, Müller MJ. Protein-calorie malnutrition in liver cirrhosis. Clin Investig. 1992;70(6):478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1):217–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okafor PN, Nnadi AK, Okoli O, Huang AE, Nwaiwu O. Same- vs different-hospital readmissions in patients with cirrhosis after hospital discharge. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(3):464–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bajaj JS, Reddy KR, Tandon P, Wong F, Kamath PS, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. The 3-month readmission rate remains unacceptably high in a large North American cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merli M, Lucidi C, Giannelli V, Giusto M, Riggio O, Falcone M, et al. Cirrhotic patients are at risk for health care-associated bacterial infections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(11):979-985.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. da SilvaAlvares Mário R, da SilveiraReverbel T. Comparison between handgrip strength, subjective global assessment, and prognostic nutritional index in assessing malnutrition and predicting clinical outcome in cirrhotic outpatients. Nutrition. 2005;21(2):113–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendenhall C, Roselle GA, Gartside P, Moritz T. Relationship of protein calorie malnutrition to alcoholic liver disease: a reexamination of data from two veterans administration cooperative studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19(3):635–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai JC, Tandon P, Bernal W, Tapper EB, Ekong U, Dasarathy S, et al. Malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis: 2021 practice guidance by the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2021;74(3):1611–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saraswat VA, Kumar K. Untangling the web of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in chronic liver disease. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022;12(2):268–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao HJ, Ye Q, Zhang M, Qi YM, Han T, Wang X. Risk factors of cirrhosis combined with sarcopenia and their impact on clinical outcomes. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2020;28(1):53–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Figueiredo FAF, de Mello Perez R, Kondo M. Effect of liver cirrhosis on body composition: evidence of significant depletion even in mild disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20(2):209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grover I, Singh N, Gunjan D, Pandey RM, Chandra Sati H, Saraya A. Comparison of anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition in cirrhosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022;12(2):467–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. NHS England. Next steps on the NHS Five Year Forward View. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/next-steps-on-the-nhs-five-year-forward-view/. 2019.

  18. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, de Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Manuel Gómez J, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(6):1430–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lukaski HC, Johnson PE, Bolonchuk WW, Lykken GI. Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;41(4):810–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazankov K, Novelli S, Chatterjee DA, Phillips A, Balaji A, Raja M, et al. Evaluation of CirrhoCare® - a digital health solution for home management of individuals with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2023;78(1):123–32. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.034.

  21. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the clinical frailty scale. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Carey EJ, Lai JC, Wang CW, Dasarathy S, Lobach I, Montano-Loza AJ, et al. A multicenter study to define sarcopenia in patients with end-stage liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2017;23(5):625–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamath P. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pirlich M, Schutz T, Spachos T, Ertl S, Weis M, Lochs H, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful bedside technique to assess malnutrition in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Hepatology. 2000;32(6):1208–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruiz-Margáin A, Xie JJ, Román-Calleja BM, Pauly M, White MG, Chapa-Ibargüengoitia M, et al. Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of sarcopenia in cirrhosis with or without ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(9):1941-1949.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Viertel M, Bock C, Reich M, Löser S, Plauth M. Performance of CT-based low skeletal muscle index, low mean muscle attenuation, and bioelectric impedance derived low phase angle in the detection of an increased risk of nutrition related mortality. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2375–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bellafronte NT, Diani LM, Vega-Piris L, Cuadrado GB, Chiarello PG. Comparison between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance for body composition measurements in adults with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional, longitudinal, multi-treatment analysis. Nutrition. 2021;82: 111059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morley JE, Vellas B, van KanAbella G, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang S, Whitlock R, Xu C, Taneja S, Singh S, Abraldes JG, et al. Frailty is associated with increased risk of cirrhosis disease progression and death. Hepatology. 2022;75(3):600–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Laube R, Wang H, Park L, Heyman JK, Vidot H, Majumdar A, et al. Frailty in advanced liver disease. Liver Int. 2018;38(12):2117–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tandon P, Tangri N, Thomas L, Zenith L, Shaikh T, Carbonneau M, et al. A rapid bedside screen to predict unplanned hospitalization and death in outpatients with cirrhosis: a prospective evaluation of the clinical frailty scale. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1759–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dunn MA, Josbeno DA, Tevar AD, Rachakonda V, Ganesh SR, Schmotzer AR, et al. Frailty as tested by gait speed is an independent risk factor for cirrhosis complications that require hospitalization. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1768–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazurak VC, Tandon P, Montano-Loza AJ. Nutrition and the transplant candidate. Liver Transpl. 2017;23(11):1451–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Kashani K. Serum creatinine level, a surrogate of muscle mass, predicts mortality in critically ill patients. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(5):E305–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ebadi M, Bhanji RA, Mazurak VC, Montano-Loza AJ. Sarcopenia in cirrhosis: from pathogenesis to interventions. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(10):845–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Trebicka J, Fernandez J, Papp M, Caraceni P, Laleman W, Gambino C, et al. The PREDICT study uncovers three clinical courses of acutely decompensated cirrhosis that have distinct pathophysiology. J Hepatol. 2020;73(4):842–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tandon P, Montano-Loza AJ, Lai JC, Dasarathy S, Merli M. Sarcopenia and frailty in decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2021;75:S147–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Dolz C, Raurich JM, Ibanez J, Obrador A, Marse P, Gaya J. Ascites increases the resting energy expenditure in liver cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1991;100(3):738–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Campillo B, Phuong NB, Pornin B, Devanlay M. Influence of liver failure, ascites, and energy expenditure on the response to oral nutrition in alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 1997;13(7):613–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK

    K. Gananandan, V. Thomas, K. Kazankov & R. P. Mookerjee

  2. Royal Free Hospital, London, UK

    W. L. Woo

  3. CyberLiver Limited, London, UK

    R. Boddu, R. Kumar, M. Raja & A. Balaji

  4. Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    K. Kazankov & R. P. Mookerjee

Authors
  1. K. Gananandan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. L. Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Boddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Raja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Balaji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. K. Kazankov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. R. P. Mookerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KG was involved in analysing the data, interpreting the findings, and writing the article. VT was involved in analysing the data and contributed to the writing of the article. WLW provided assistance in analysing the data. RB, RK, MR and AB performed roles in facilitating and carrying out the study. KK and RPM were involved in study design and carrying out the study. RPM was also involved manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Gananandan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This was a retrospective analysis, but ethical approval was obtained for the initial study. The study was approved by the London-Brighton & Sussex Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID 285666; REC number 20/HRA/3843; NCT05045924) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gananandan, K., Thomas, V., Woo, W.L. et al. Fat mass: a novel digital biomarker for remote monitoring that may indicate risk for malnutrition and new complications in decompensated cirrhosis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 23, 180 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12911-023-02288-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12911-023-02288-z

Keywords

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us